Clipart Of Respiration

Speaking of press freedom

The information does not pass the straight-line media receiver, since in this process is a mixture of different political and economic interests, ideological views, levels of ability and / or knowledge and other factors. This is reflected in the media's editorial policy.

public media in the interest of the incumbent and its editorial policy is defined in this regard. Even when support and disseminate official divergent positions on this is that there is an editorial policy that allows this circumstance, with the aim of providing an image of openness and tolerance.

Private media in the interest, ideology, vision or the owners of the medium, usually expressed through an editorial policy that is more or less explicit. The ideal is that this was public knowledge so that citizens know what to expect when they come to learn by any means.

In these circumstances, are the owners or boards who decide what is published or transmitted and what not, but also how public it was decided to publish. A This is called the media's editorial policy, because it represents certain interests in society. However, columnists and editorialists have a wide range of opinion in the media, especially the writings, but rarely in open discord with the media's editorial policy that gives rostrum.

The situation of those working in the media is different. Journalists can sympathize with some orientation issue but the editorial policy of the media in question is reluctant to issue guidance or journalist want, not be allowed to write or broadcast about it or have to do this through short notes, partial and even pointless.

Freedom of the press is that the State first agents or other force or power, such as organized crime, can not impose editorial line, control what is published, censoring the media or wipe them out.

Imagine an example:

could hardly think of the headline on Channel 22, "Calderon illegitimate, trapping the 2006 elections."
Header
that we normally would in a newspaper as Day or http://www.amlo.org.mx portal.

grim that the government would retaliate against the day or the site mentioned, but no surprise to dismiss those who placed the header anticalderonista (sic) on channel 22.
boring reminder

This is a case for Aristegui-Vargas affair (MVS).

guess when negotiating the incorporation of the morning news Aristegui talked MVS, reached an agreement beyond the economic sphere, since none of the actors are new, naive or stupid. This agreement was stored in the consciousness of each and subject to interpretation. Or if I am writing to present it.

The way I try Aristegui the rumor or accusation of alcoholism course Calderon questioned the agreement of the parties and we all know the result, but I insist we do not know the deal. While the dark persistence of opinion will be thin.

From there everything is dark. "The agreement allowed Ms. Aristegui say what he said? Do we really pressured the President to restrict the freedom of the press?

decirdiciendolocontrario A humble means and no problems so far, since one is the "owner" it is the writer, his impact almost zero, has wonderful readers and the government are not even aware, therefore, does not tickle him.

and finish certainly is not worth recalling that in countries with authoritarian regimes (Mexico until recent years) the media is controlled or censored by the government. PD

Sorry I was too formal. Extra

. Today, Wednesday 16 February, published a document signed by MVS and Aristegui. Go to